Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) in Namibia
Namibia: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) was 54.0% in 2024. ▬ Flat
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population in Namibia, 2015–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Measured in %.
Analysis
Namibia recorded 54.0% for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population in 2024.
That represents a change of down 3.4% on the previous year and up 1.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population in Namibia peaked at 57.9% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 53.2%, in 2015.
Namibia ranks 25th of 130 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) in Namibia, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 53.2% | — |
| 2016 | 54.3% | +2.1% |
| 2017 | 55.3% | +1.8% |
| 2018 | 56.5% | +2.2% |
| 2019 | 57.6% | +1.9% |
| 2020 | 57.9% | +0.5% |
| 2021 | 57.7% | -0.3% |
| 2022 | 56.8% | -1.6% |
| 2023 | 55.9% | -1.6% |
| 2024 | 54.0% | -3.4% |
Namibia compared with similar countries
- Namibia's 54.0% is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 43.7%, 1.2× the median. (32 countries reporting)
- Namibia's 54.0% is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 60.5%, 89% of the median. (34 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 55.4% | 53.2% | 57.6% | 5 |
| 2020s | 56.5% | 54.0% | 57.9% | 5 |
Countries ranked near Namibia
More health data for Namibia
- Un projection of annual infant deaths, annual growth rate -1.75 % change on previous year (2100)
- Heat deaths vs projected death rates, annual growth rate 0.6445 % change on previous year (2090)
- Un projection of annual infant deaths 561 (2100)
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled 1 (2024)
- Population ages 00-04, female, annual growth rate -1.83 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per capita 0.0644 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, annual growth rate -1.56 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, per capita 0.0646 units per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population in Namibia?
- Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population in Namibia was 54.0% in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
- What is the highest prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population recorded in Namibia?
- The highest recorded value was 57.9% in 2020.
- What is the lowest prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population recorded in Namibia?
- The lowest recorded value was 53.2% in 2015.
- How does Namibia rank for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Namibia ranks 25th out of 130 countries with data for 2024.
- Is prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population rising or falling in Namibia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Namibia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as part of Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.