Namibia vs Niger: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) over time
- Namibia
- Niger
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 54.0% against 50.3% in Niger, a difference of 3.7%.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Niger's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 25th and Niger ranks 28th of 130 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 56.5% | 50.0% | 6.4% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 56.5% | 50.4% | 6.1% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Namibia or Niger?
- Namibia, at 54.0% against 50.3% in Niger as of 2024.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Namibia and Niger?
- 3.7%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Niger?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Niger rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Namibia ranks 25th and Niger ranks 28th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.