Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population (%) in Luxembourg
Luxembourg: Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population (%) was 0.6% in 2024. ▼ Falling
Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population in Luxembourg, 2015–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2024, prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population in Luxembourg stood at 0.6%. That is the lowest value across all 10 years on record.
The figure is down 66.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population in Luxembourg peaked at 1.8% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0.6%, in 2021.
That places Luxembourg 116th out of 128 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population (%) in Luxembourg, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1.8% | — |
| 2016 | 1.4% | -22.2% |
| 2017 | 0.9% | -35.7% |
| 2018 | 0.9% | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.8% | -11.1% |
| 2020 | 0.7% | -12.5% |
| 2021 | 0.6% | -14.3% |
| 2022 | 0.6% | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.6% | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.6% | +0.0% |
Luxembourg compared with similar countries
- Luxembourg's 0.6% is below the median for high income countries, which is 1.9%, 32% of the median. (42 countries reporting)
- Luxembourg's 0.6% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.8%, 34% of the median. (44 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.2% | 0.8% | 1.8% | 5 |
| 2020s | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.7% | 5 |
Countries ranked near Luxembourg
More health data for Luxembourg
- Un projection of annual infant deaths, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2100)
- Heat deaths vs projected death rates, annual growth rate -0.5867 % change on previous year (2090)
- Un projection of annual infant deaths 4 (2100)
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled 0 (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, annual growth rate 1.63 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per capita 0.0253 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, annual growth rate 2.27 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, per capita 0.0264 units per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population in Luxembourg?
- Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population in Luxembourg was 0.6% in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
- What is the highest prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population recorded in Luxembourg?
- The highest recorded value was 1.8% in 2015.
- What is the lowest prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population recorded in Luxembourg?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.6% in 2021.
- How does Luxembourg rank for prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population?
- Luxembourg ranks 116th out of 128 countries with data for 2024.
- Is prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population rising or falling in Luxembourg?
- Over the last ten years it is down 66.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Luxembourg data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as part of Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as severely food insecure. A household is classified as severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to several of the most severe experiences described in the FIES questions, such as to have been forced to reduce the quantity of the food, to have skipped meals, having gone hungry, or having to go for a whole day without eating because of a lack of money or other resources.