Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of
Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre was 0.5349 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
0.5349 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 2.4%
World rank
161st
of 216 countries
All-time high
0.5349 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.0721 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of stood at 0.5349 units per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.4% on the previous year and up 45.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of peaked at 0.5349 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.0721 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Tanzania, United Republic of 161st out of 216 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0721 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0743 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1963 | 0.0767 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1964 | 0.0792 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1965 | 0.0818 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1966 | 0.0845 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1967 | 0.0873 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1968 | 0.0904 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1969 | 0.0941 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1970 | 0.0983 units per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1971 | 0.1031 units per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1972 | 0.1085 units per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1973 | 0.1143 units per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1974 | 0.1203 units per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1975 | 0.1263 units per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1976 | 0.1325 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1977 | 0.1387 units per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1978 | 0.1445 units per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1979 | 0.1498 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1980 | 0.1547 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1981 | 0.1592 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1982 | 0.1636 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1983 | 0.1677 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1984 | 0.1716 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1985 | 0.1753 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1986 | 0.1784 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1987 | 0.1811 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1988 | 0.1836 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1989 | 0.1865 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1990 | 0.1897 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1991 | 0.1934 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1992 | 0.1975 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1993 | 0.2017 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1994 | 0.2059 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1995 | 0.21 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1996 | 0.2137 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1997 | 0.217 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1998 | 0.2202 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1999 | 0.223 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2000 | 0.2256 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2001 | 0.2286 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2002 | 0.2321 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2003 | 0.2362 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2004 | 0.2409 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2005 | 0.2466 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2006 | 0.2538 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2007 | 0.2629 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2008 | 0.2743 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2009 | 0.2883 units per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2010 | 0.3052 units per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2011 | 0.3247 units per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 2012 | 0.3461 units per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 2013 | 0.3672 units per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2014 | 0.3852 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2015 | 0.4009 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2016 | 0.4163 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2017 | 0.4319 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2018 | 0.4489 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2019 | 0.4685 units per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2020 | 0.4891 units per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2021 | 0.5073 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2022 | 0.5226 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2023 | 0.5349 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0823 units per square kilometre | 0.0721 units per square kilometre | 0.0941 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.1236 units per square kilometre | 0.0983 units per square kilometre | 0.1498 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1722 units per square kilometre | 0.1547 units per square kilometre | 0.1865 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.2072 units per square kilometre | 0.1897 units per square kilometre | 0.223 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.2489 units per square kilometre | 0.2256 units per square kilometre | 0.2883 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.3895 units per square kilometre | 0.3052 units per square kilometre | 0.4685 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.5135 units per square kilometre | 0.4891 units per square kilometre | 0.5349 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania, United Republic of
- 158 Kyrgyzstan 0.5389 units per square kilometre compare
- 159 Equatorial Guinea 0.538 units per square kilometre compare
- 160 Brazil 0.5363 units per square kilometre compare
- 162 Côte d'Ivoire 0.529 units per square kilometre compare
- 163 New Zealand 0.5256 units per square kilometre compare
- 164 Djibouti 0.507 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Tanzania, United Republic of
- Un projection of annual infant deaths, annual growth rate -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Heat deaths vs projected death rates, annual growth rate 0.7342 % change on previous year (2090)
- Estimated changes in temperature-related death rates compared to projected death rates 658.6 deaths per 1,000 people (2090)
- Number of infants who die before age 1 32,514 deaths (2100)
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled 13 (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, annual growth rate 1.86 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per capita 0.0786 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, annual growth rate 1.89 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of was 0.5349 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5349 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0721 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Tanzania, United Republic of rank for population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 161st out of 216 countries with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre rising or falling in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Over the last ten years it is up 45.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tanzania, United Republic of data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 65-69, female ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 65-69, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.