New Zealand vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre

New Zealand
0.5256 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.5349 units per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
163rd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
161st

Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre over time

  • New Zealand
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.5349 units per square kilometre against 0.5256 units per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0093 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 163rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 161st of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 6 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1593 units per square kilometre 0.0823 units per square kilometre 0.077 units per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 0.2009 units per square kilometre 0.1236 units per square kilometre 0.0773 units per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0.2328 units per square kilometre 0.1722 units per square kilometre 0.0606 units per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 0.259 units per square kilometre 0.2072 units per square kilometre 0.0518 units per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0.2872 units per square kilometre 0.2489 units per square kilometre 0.0383 units per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 0.4138 units per square kilometre 0.3895 units per square kilometre 0.0243 units per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 0.5015 units per square kilometre 0.5135 units per square kilometre 0.012 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre, New Zealand or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.5349 units per square kilometre against 0.5256 units per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre between New Zealand and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0093 units per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre?
New Zealand ranks 163rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 161st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/tanzania/">New Zealand vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.