Brazil vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre

Brazil
0.5363 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.5349 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
160th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
161st

Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.5363 units per square kilometre against 0.5349 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0014 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Brazil ranks 160th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 161st of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0651 units per square kilometre 0.0823 units per square kilometre 0.0171 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1970s 0.0952 units per square kilometre 0.1236 units per square kilometre 0.0284 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 0.1356 units per square kilometre 0.1722 units per square kilometre 0.0366 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 0.2046 units per square kilometre 0.2072 units per square kilometre 0.0026 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 0.2617 units per square kilometre 0.2489 units per square kilometre 0.0127 units per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 0.3782 units per square kilometre 0.3895 units per square kilometre 0.0113 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.5099 units per square kilometre 0.5135 units per square kilometre 0.0036 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre, Brazil or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Brazil, at 0.5363 units per square kilometre against 0.5349 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre between Brazil and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0014 units per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 160th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 161st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-per-square-kilometre/brazil/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-per-square-kilometre/brazil/tanzania/">Brazil vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.