AFR vs South Sudan: Proportion of population with primary reliance on polluting fuels and
AFR
91.9%
in 2023
South Sudan
100.0%
in 2023
AFR rank
1st
South Sudan rank
1st
Proportion of population with primary reliance on polluting fuels and over time
- AFR
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 100.0% against 91.9% in AFR, a difference of 8.1%.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times AFR's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
AFR ranks 1st and South Sudan ranks 1st of 13 groups.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AFR | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 94.9% | 99.8% | 5.0% | South Sudan |
| 2000s | 94.6% | 99.9% | 5.3% | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 93.9% | 100.0% | 6.1% | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 92.4% | 100.0% | 7.6% | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of population with primary reliance on polluting fuels and, AFR or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 100.0% against 91.9% in AFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in proportion of population with primary reliance on polluting fuels and between AFR and South Sudan?
- 8.1%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AFR and South Sudan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do AFR and South Sudan rank globally for proportion of population with primary reliance on polluting fuels and?
- AFR ranks 1st and South Sudan ranks 1st of 13 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Proportion of population with primary reliance on polluting fuels and technologies for cooking (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.