Namibia vs South Asia: Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population
Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population over time
- Namibia
- South Asia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 30.0% against 18.0% in South Asia, a difference of 12.0%.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.7 times South Asia's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 8th and South Asia ranks 6th of 125 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | South Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 30.5% | 15.6% | 14.9% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 31.9% | 20.5% | 11.3% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population, Namibia or South Asia?
- Namibia, at 30.0% against 18.0% in South Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population between Namibia and South Asia?
- 12.0%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and South Asia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Namibia and South Asia rank globally for prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population?
- Namibia ranks 8th and South Asia ranks 6th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as severely food insecure. A household is classified as severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to several of the most severe experiences described in the FIES questions, such as to have been forced to reduce the quantity of the food, to have skipped meals, having gone hungry, or having to go for a whole day without eating because of a lack of money or other resources.