Kyrgyzstan vs Netherlands: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Netherlands
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 7.5% against 7.0% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 105th and Netherlands ranks 103rd of 126 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.3% | 4.9% | 1.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 6.8% | 4.8% | 2.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Kyrgyzstan or Netherlands?
- Netherlands, at 7.5% against 7.0% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Kyrgyzstan and Netherlands?
- 0.5%, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Netherlands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2022.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Netherlands rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 105th and Netherlands ranks 103rd of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.