Azerbaijan vs Hungary: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population over time
- Azerbaijan
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 15.6% against 14.0% in Azerbaijan, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Hungary ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 77th and Hungary ranks 74th of 126 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.1% | 9.0% | 0.9% | Hungary |
| 2020s | 11.4% | 13.4% | 2.0% | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Azerbaijan or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 15.6% against 14.0% in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Azerbaijan and Hungary?
- 1.6%, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Hungary?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Hungary rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Azerbaijan ranks 77th and Hungary ranks 74th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.