Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Ecuador
Ecuador: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre was 1.09 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
1.09 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 3.1%
World rank
126th
of 216 countries
All-time high
1.09 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.1642 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Ecuador is 1.09 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.1% on the previous year and up 44.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Ecuador peaked at 1.09 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.1642 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Ecuador 126th out of 216 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.1642 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.1654 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1963 | 0.1668 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1964 | 0.1687 units per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1965 | 0.1711 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1966 | 0.1741 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1967 | 0.1778 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1968 | 0.1818 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1969 | 0.1858 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1970 | 0.1897 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1971 | 0.1935 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1972 | 0.1969 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1973 | 0.2003 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1974 | 0.2046 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1975 | 0.2096 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1976 | 0.2156 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1977 | 0.2228 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1978 | 0.2306 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1979 | 0.2375 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1980 | 0.2431 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1981 | 0.2474 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1982 | 0.2502 units per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1983 | 0.2524 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1984 | 0.2553 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1985 | 0.2598 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1986 | 0.2656 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1987 | 0.2728 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1988 | 0.2813 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1989 | 0.2908 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1990 | 0.3014 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1991 | 0.313 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1992 | 0.3252 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1993 | 0.3378 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1994 | 0.3505 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1995 | 0.3633 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1996 | 0.3759 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1997 | 0.3883 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1998 | 0.4466 units per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 1999 | 0.4603 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2000 | 0.4742 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2001 | 0.4884 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2002 | 0.5028 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2003 | 0.518 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2004 | 0.535 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2005 | 0.5538 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2006 | 0.5741 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2007 | 0.5963 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2008 | 0.6206 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2009 | 0.6462 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2010 | 0.6721 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2011 | 0.6979 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2012 | 0.7244 units per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2013 | 0.7562 units per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2014 | 0.7951 units per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2015 | 0.8365 units per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2016 | 0.8779 units per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2017 | 0.9193 units per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2018 | 0.9565 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2019 | 0.9874 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2020 | 1.01 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2021 | 1.03 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2022 | 1.06 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2023 | 1.09 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1729 units per square kilometre | 0.1642 units per square kilometre | 0.1858 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.2101 units per square kilometre | 0.1897 units per square kilometre | 0.2375 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.2619 units per square kilometre | 0.2431 units per square kilometre | 0.2908 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.3662 units per square kilometre | 0.3014 units per square kilometre | 0.4603 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.5509 units per square kilometre | 0.4742 units per square kilometre | 0.6462 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.8223 units per square kilometre | 0.6721 units per square kilometre | 0.9874 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.05 units per square kilometre | 1.01 units per square kilometre | 1.09 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 123 Latvia 1.12 units per square kilometre compare
- 124 Estonia 1.1 units per square kilometre compare
- 125 Uzbekistan 1.1 units per square kilometre compare
- 127 United States of America 1.07 units per square kilometre compare
- 128 Mexico 1.06 units per square kilometre compare
- 129 Turks and Caicos Islands 1.01 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Ecuador
- Un projection of annual infant deaths, annual growth rate -1.67 % change on previous year (2100)
- Heat deaths vs projected death rates, annual growth rate 0.6766 % change on previous year (2090)
- Estimated changes in temperature-related death rates compared to projected death rates 1,324 deaths per 1,000 people (2090)
- Number of infants who die before age 1 354 deaths (2100)
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled 0 (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, annual growth rate -1.67 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per capita 0.0362 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, annual growth rate -1.67 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Ecuador?
- Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre in Ecuador was 1.09 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 1.09 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1642 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Ecuador rank for population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre?
- Ecuador ranks 126th out of 216 countries with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 44.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 65-69, female ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 65-69, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.