Ecuador vs United States of America: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre

Ecuador
1.09 units per square kilometre
in 2023
United States of America
1.07 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
126th
United States of America rank
127th

Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • United States of America
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 1.09 units per square kilometre against 1.07 units per square kilometre in United States of America, a difference of 0.02 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United States of America ahead.

Ecuador ranks 126th and United States of America ranks 127th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and United States of America in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador United States of America Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1729 units per square kilometre 0.3822 units per square kilometre 0.2093 units per square kilometre United States of America
1970s 0.2101 units per square kilometre 0.4627 units per square kilometre 0.2526 units per square kilometre United States of America
1980s 0.2619 units per square kilometre 0.5513 units per square kilometre 0.2894 units per square kilometre United States of America
1990s 0.3662 units per square kilometre 0.5739 units per square kilometre 0.2076 units per square kilometre United States of America
2000s 0.5509 units per square kilometre 0.5916 units per square kilometre 0.0407 units per square kilometre United States of America
2010s 0.8223 units per square kilometre 0.8551 units per square kilometre 0.0328 units per square kilometre United States of America
2020s 1.05 units per square kilometre 1.03 units per square kilometre 0.0163 units per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre, Ecuador or United States of America?
Ecuador, at 1.09 units per square kilometre against 1.07 units per square kilometre in United States of America as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre between Ecuador and United States of America?
0.02 units per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and United States of America?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and United States of America rank globally for population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 126th and United States of America ranks 127th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs United States of America: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/united-states/">Ecuador vs United States of America: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.