Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP in South Asia
South Asia: Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP in South Asia, 1960–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
South Asia recorded 0 units per US$ of GDP for population ages 00-04, male, per unit of gdp in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 66 years on record.
That represents a change of down 5.1% on the previous year and down 51.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 00-04, male, per unit of gdp in South Asia peaked at 0.001 units per US$ of GDP in 1960 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2025.
South Asia ranks 13th of 43 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP in South Asia, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0.001 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1961 | 0.001 units per US$ of GDP | -4.0% |
| 1962 | 0.0009 units per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 1963 | 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP | -9.2% |
| 1964 | 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 1965 | 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 1966 | 0.0009 units per US$ of GDP | +26.3% |
| 1967 | 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 1968 | 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 1969 | 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 1970 | 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP | -4.9% |
| 1971 | 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 1972 | 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP | -0.6% |
| 1973 | 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP | -14.8% |
| 1974 | 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP | -14.8% |
| 1975 | 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 1976 | 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP | +6.8% |
| 1977 | 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP | -12.0% |
| 1978 | 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 1979 | 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP | -9.2% |
| 1980 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -15.7% |
| 1981 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -2.5% |
| 1982 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -0.6% |
| 1983 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | +3.7% |
| 1985 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -7.3% |
| 1986 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 1987 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -9.2% |
| 1988 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 1989 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | +0.5% |
| 1990 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -7.1% |
| 1991 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | +16.8% |
| 1992 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 1993 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | +2.6% |
| 1994 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 1995 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -8.8% |
| 1996 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 1997 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -4.8% |
| 1998 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -0.9% |
| 1999 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -6.7% |
| 2000 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -1.7% |
| 2001 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 2002 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -4.6% |
| 2003 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -14.2% |
| 2004 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -13.5% |
| 2005 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -13.2% |
| 2006 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 2007 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -22.4% |
| 2008 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -1.4% |
| 2009 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -11.2% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -20.3% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.2% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.2% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.1% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.7% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.8% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.6% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.0% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.6% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP | 0.001 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near South Asia
- 10 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 11 Malawi 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 12 Chad 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 13 Sierra Leone 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 14 Ethiopia 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 15 South Sudan 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 16 Gambia 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP compare
More health data for South Asia
- Population ages 50-54, male, per capita 0.0262 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 50-54, female, annual growth rate 2.35 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 50-54, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 50-54, female, per capita 0.0255 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 50-54, male, annual growth rate 2.44 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 50-54, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 55-59, female, per capita 0.0217 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 55-59, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 55-59, male, annual growth rate 2.2 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 45-49, male, per capita 0.0305 units per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 00-04, male, per unit of gdp in South Asia?
- Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of gdp in South Asia was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 00-04, male, per unit of gdp recorded in South Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.001 units per US$ of GDP in 1960.
- What is the lowest population ages 00-04, male, per unit of gdp recorded in South Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025.
- How does South Asia rank for population ages 00-04, male, per unit of gdp?
- South Asia ranks 13th out of 43 groups with data for 2025.
- Is population ages 00-04, male, per unit of gdp rising or falling in South Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 51.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 66 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 00-04, male divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 00-04, male ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Population ages 00-04, male World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 00-04, male divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.