Population ages 35-39, female, per unit of GDP in South Asia
South Asia: Population ages 35-39, female, per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Population ages 35-39, female, per unit of GDP in South Asia, 1960–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2025, population ages 35-39, female, per unit of gdp in South Asia stood at 0 units per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 66 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.7% on the previous year and down 35.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 35-39, female, per unit of gdp in South Asia peaked at 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP in 1960 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2025.
South Asia ranks 11th of 43 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 35-39, female, per unit of GDP in South Asia, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1961 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 1962 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -4.7% |
| 1963 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -9.5% |
| 1964 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -11.1% |
| 1965 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 1966 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | +26.8% |
| 1967 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | -2.8% |
| 1969 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 1970 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -4.7% |
| 1971 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 1972 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -0.6% |
| 1973 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -15.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -15.2% |
| 1975 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | -3.9% |
| 1976 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | +5.8% |
| 1977 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 1978 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -11.0% |
| 1979 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -9.7% |
| 1980 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -15.9% |
| 1981 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -2.5% |
| 1982 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -0.3% |
| 1983 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -4.8% |
| 1984 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +4.9% |
| 1985 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 1986 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -1.6% |
| 1987 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 1988 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 1989 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +4.2% |
| 1990 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 1991 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +20.1% |
| 1992 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -2.6% |
| 1993 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +5.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -11.1% |
| 1995 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -7.1% |
| 1996 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -6.9% |
| 1997 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 1998 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 1999 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 2000 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -0.3% |
| 2001 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -1.2% |
| 2002 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 2003 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 2004 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -11.9% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.3% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -19.9% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.8% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.3% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.7% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.5% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.5% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.6% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.3% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.7% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.5% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.5% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.2% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.1% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near South Asia
- 8 Central African Republic 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 9 Lesotho 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 10 Somalia 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 11 Sierra Leone 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 12 Gambia 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 13 South Sudan 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 14 Liberia 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
More health data for South Asia
- Population ages 0-14, female, annual growth rate -0.6893 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 0-14, total, annual growth rate -0.7947 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 0-14, male, per capita 0.1278 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 0-14, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 0-14, male, annual growth rate -0.8925 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 0-14, female, per capita 0.1181 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 0-14, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 80 and above, female, per capita 0.0064 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 80 and above, male, annual growth rate 4.63 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 80 and above, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 35-39, female, per unit of gdp in South Asia?
- Population ages 35-39, female, per unit of gdp in South Asia was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 35-39, female, per unit of gdp recorded in South Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP in 1960.
- What is the lowest population ages 35-39, female, per unit of gdp recorded in South Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025.
- How does South Asia rank for population ages 35-39, female, per unit of gdp?
- South Asia ranks 11th out of 43 groups with data for 2025.
- Is population ages 35-39, female, per unit of gdp rising or falling in South Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 35.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 35-39, female, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 66 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 35-39, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 35-39, female ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Population ages 35-39, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 35-39, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.