How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Uganda?

19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Early-demographic dividend vs Uganda: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care

Early-demographic dividend

23.0%

in 2022

Uganda

68.4%

in 2022

Early-demographic dividend rank

17th

Uganda rank

15th

Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time

Early-demographic dividend
Uganda

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 68.4% against 23.0% in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 45.4%.

That makes Uganda's figure about 3.0 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 17th and Uganda ranks 15th of 39 groups.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Early-demographic dividend	Uganda	Difference	Ahead
2000s	57.6%	90.0%	32.4%	Uganda
2010s	37.4%	73.7%	36.3%	Uganda
2020s	24.3%	69.1%	44.8%	Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Early-demographic dividend or Uganda?: Uganda, at 68.4% against 23.0% in Early-demographic dividend as of 2022.
What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Early-demographic dividend and Uganda?: 45.4%, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Uganda?: 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Uganda rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?: Early-demographic dividend ranks 17th and Uganda ranks 15th of 39 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Uganda: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care. Statizoid, drawing on Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/risk-of-catastrophic-expenditure-for-surgical-care-percent-of-people-at-risk/early-demographic-dividend/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/risk-of-catastrophic-expenditure-for-surgical-care-percent-of-people-at-risk/early-demographic-dividend/uganda/">Early-demographic dividend vs Uganda: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk)
Unit: % of people at risk
Source: Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 173 places, 3,065 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed: 17 September 2026

The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.