Sur vs Tuvalu: Raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/L)
Sur
11.9
in 2014
Tuvalu
23.1
in 2014
Sur rank
2nd
Tuvalu rank
4th
Raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/L) over time
- Sur
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 23.1 against 11.9 in Sur, a difference of 11.2.
That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.9 times Sur's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.
Sur ranks 2nd and Tuvalu ranks 4th of 2 regions.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sur | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 6.11 | 8.23 | 2.12 | Tuvalu |
| 1990s | 7.23 | 13.08 | 5.85 | Tuvalu |
| 2000s | 9.16 | 18.38 | 9.22 | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 11.28 | 22.18 | 10.9 | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/l), Sur or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 23.1 against 11.9 in Sur as of 2014.
- What is the difference in raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/l) between Sur and Tuvalu?
- 11.2, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sur and Tuvalu?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2014.
- How do Sur and Tuvalu rank globally for raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/l)?
- Sur ranks 2nd and Tuvalu ranks 4th of 2 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/L) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.