Kiribati vs Marshall Islands: Raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/L)
Kiribati
22
in 2014
Marshall Islands
20.7
in 2014
Kiribati rank
7th
Marshall Islands rank
9th
Raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/L) over time
- Kiribati
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 22 against 20.7 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 1.3.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Marshall Islands's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Kiribati ranks 7th and Marshall Islands ranks 9th of 189 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Marshall Islands in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 6.39 | 8.59 | 2.2 | Marshall Islands |
| 1990s | 10.93 | 12.64 | 1.71 | Marshall Islands |
| 2000s | 16.83 | 16.95 | 0.12 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 21 | 20.04 | 0.96 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/l), Kiribati or Marshall Islands?
- Kiribati, at 22 against 20.7 in Marshall Islands as of 2014.
- What is the difference in raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/l) between Kiribati and Marshall Islands?
- 1.3, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Marshall Islands?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2014.
- How do Kiribati and Marshall Islands rank globally for raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/l)?
- Kiribati ranks 7th and Marshall Islands ranks 9th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Raised fasting blood glucose (>= 7.0 mmol/L) (crude estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.