Namibia vs Sri Lanka: Raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/L)
Namibia
7.4
in 2014
Sri Lanka
7.4
in 2014
Namibia rank
116th
Sri Lanka rank
116th
Raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/L) over time
- Namibia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 7.4 against 7.4 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Namibia ranks 116th and Sri Lanka ranks 116th of 189 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3.53 | 3.64 | 0.11 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 4.58 | 4.68 | 0.1 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 6.11 | 5.97 | 0.14 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 7.16 | 7.04 | 0.12 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/l), Namibia or Sri Lanka?
- Namibia, at 7.4 against 7.4 in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
- What is the difference in raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/l) between Namibia and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sri Lanka?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2014.
- How do Namibia and Sri Lanka rank globally for raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/l)?
- Namibia ranks 116th and Sri Lanka ranks 116th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/L) (age-standardized estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.