Northern Africa and Western Asia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household

Northern Africa and Western Asia
23.9%
in 2022
United Republic of Tanzania
37.5%
in 2020
Northern Africa and Western Asia rank
7th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
6th

Proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household over time

  • Northern Africa and Western Asia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
2030405060200020112022

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 37.5% against 23.9% in Northern Africa and Western Asia, a difference of 13.6%.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.6 times Northern Africa and Western Asia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Northern Africa and Western Asia ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 14 groups.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Northern Africa and Western Asia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 23.9% 59.3% 35.4% United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 22.8% 27.0% 4.3% United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 23.4% 37.5% 14.1% United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household, Northern Africa and Western Asia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 37.5% against 23.9% in Northern Africa and Western Asia as of 2020.
What is the difference in proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household between Northern Africa and Western Asia and United Republic of Tanzania?
13.6%, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Africa and Western Asia and United Republic of Tanzania?
5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Northern Africa and Western Asia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household?
Northern Africa and Western Asia ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 14 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household expenditure on health exceeding 40% of household discretionary budget, by location, quintile, type of household and characteristics of the head of household (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Northern Africa and Western Asia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-the-population-with-positive-out-of-pocket-household-expenditure-on-health/northern-africa-and-western-asia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-the-population-with-positive-out-of-pocket-household-expenditure-on-health/northern-africa-and-western-asia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Northern Africa and Western Asia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household expenditure on health exceeding 40% of household discretionary budget, by location, quintile, type of household and characteristics of the head of household (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
88 places, 1,175 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed