Eastern and South-Eastern Asia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia
26.9%
in 2022
United Republic of Tanzania
37.5%
in 2020
Eastern and South-Eastern Asia rank
5th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
6th

Proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household over time

  • Eastern and South-Eastern Asia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
2030405060200020112022

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 37.5% against 26.9% in Eastern and South-Eastern Asia, a difference of 10.6%.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.4 times Eastern and South-Eastern Asia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia ranks 5th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 14 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Eastern and South-Eastern Asia averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern and South-Eastern Asia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 37.1% 59.3% 22.1% United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 31.7% 27.0% 4.7% Eastern and South-Eastern Asia
2020s 27.9% 37.5% 9.6% United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household, Eastern and South-Eastern Asia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 37.5% against 26.9% in Eastern and South-Eastern Asia as of 2020.
What is the difference in proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household between Eastern and South-Eastern Asia and United Republic of Tanzania?
10.6%, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern and South-Eastern Asia and United Republic of Tanzania?
5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Eastern and South-Eastern Asia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household?
Eastern and South-Eastern Asia ranks 5th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 14 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household expenditure on health exceeding 40% of household discretionary budget, by location, quintile, type of household and characteristics of the head of household (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern and South-Eastern Asia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-the-population-with-positive-out-of-pocket-household-expenditure-on-health/eastern-and-south-eastern-asia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-the-population-with-positive-out-of-pocket-household-expenditure-on-health/eastern-and-south-eastern-asia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Eastern and South-Eastern Asia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household expenditure on health exceeding 40% of household discretionary budget, by location, quintile, type of household and characteristics of the head of household (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
88 places, 1,175 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed