EMR vs South Sudan: Proportion of population with primary reliance on polluting fuels and
EMR
45.2%
in 2023
South Sudan
100.0%
in 2023
EMR rank
3rd
South Sudan rank
1st
Proportion of population with primary reliance on polluting fuels and over time
- EMR
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 100.0% against 45.2% in EMR, a difference of 54.8%.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 2.2 times EMR's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
EMR ranks 3rd and South Sudan ranks 1st of 13 groups.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | EMR | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 74.5% | 99.8% | 25.4% | South Sudan |
| 2000s | 59.9% | 99.9% | 40.1% | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 52.3% | 100.0% | 47.7% | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 46.6% | 100.0% | 53.4% | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of population with primary reliance on polluting fuels and, EMR or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 100.0% against 45.2% in EMR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in proportion of population with primary reliance on polluting fuels and between EMR and South Sudan?
- 54.8%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for EMR and South Sudan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do EMR and South Sudan rank globally for proportion of population with primary reliance on polluting fuels and?
- EMR ranks 3rd and South Sudan ranks 1st of 13 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Proportion of population with primary reliance on polluting fuels and technologies for cooking (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.