Latvia vs New Zealand: Proportion of children at the end of lower secondary achieving at
Latvia
78.6%
in 2015
New Zealand
78.4%
in 2015
Latvia rank
22nd
New Zealand rank
23rd
Proportion of children at the end of lower secondary achieving at over time
- Latvia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 78.6% against 78.4% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2003 it was New Zealand ahead.
Latvia ranks 22nd and New Zealand ranks 23rd of 53 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.7% | 85.2% | 7.5% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 79.3% | 77.9% | 1.5% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of children at the end of lower secondary achieving at, Latvia or New Zealand?
- Latvia, at 78.6% against 78.4% in New Zealand as of 2015.
- What is the difference in proportion of children at the end of lower secondary achieving at between Latvia and New Zealand?
- 0.2%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2015.
- How do Latvia and New Zealand rank globally for proportion of children at the end of lower secondary achieving at?
- Latvia ranks 22nd and New Zealand ranks 23rd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Proportion of children at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.