Guatemala vs Upper middle income: Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population
Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population over time
- Guatemala
- Upper middle income
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 21.3% against 2.8% in Upper middle income, a difference of 18.5%.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 7.7 times Upper middle income's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 19th and Upper middle income ranks 17th of 125 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Upper middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 17.5% | 3.3% | 14.2% | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 20.8% | 3.6% | 17.1% | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population, Guatemala or Upper middle income?
- Guatemala, at 21.3% against 2.8% in Upper middle income as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population between Guatemala and Upper middle income?
- 18.5%, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Upper middle income?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Upper middle income rank globally for prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population?
- Guatemala ranks 19th and Upper middle income ranks 17th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as severely food insecure. A household is classified as severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to several of the most severe experiences described in the FIES questions, such as to have been forced to reduce the quantity of the food, to have skipped meals, having gone hungry, or having to go for a whole day without eating because of a lack of money or other resources.