Guatemala vs Lesotho: Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population (%)
Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population (%) over time
- Guatemala
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 24.3% against 22.4% in Guatemala, a difference of 1.9%.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 18th and Lesotho ranks 15th of 128 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.6% | 26.9% | 8.2% | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 21.1% | 25.3% | 4.2% | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population, Guatemala or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 24.3% against 22.4% in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population between Guatemala and Lesotho?
- 1.9%, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Lesotho?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Lesotho rank globally for prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population?
- Guatemala ranks 18th and Lesotho ranks 15th of 128 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as severely food insecure. A household is classified as severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to several of the most severe experiences described in the FIES questions, such as to have been forced to reduce the quantity of the food, to have skipped meals, having gone hungry, or having to go for a whole day without eating because of a lack of money or other resources.