Grenada vs New Zealand: Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population
Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population over time
- Grenada
- New Zealand
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 4.7% against 4.3% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Grenada's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 63rd and New Zealand ranks 66th of 125 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.3% | 4.2% | 4.1% | Grenada |
| 2020s | 6.0% | 3.7% | 2.3% | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population, Grenada or New Zealand?
- Grenada, at 4.7% against 4.3% in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population between Grenada and New Zealand?
- 0.4%, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and New Zealand?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and New Zealand rank globally for prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population?
- Grenada ranks 63rd and New Zealand ranks 66th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as severely food insecure. A household is classified as severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to several of the most severe experiences described in the FIES questions, such as to have been forced to reduce the quantity of the food, to have skipped meals, having gone hungry, or having to go for a whole day without eating because of a lack of money or other resources.