Paraguay vs Palestine: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) over time
- Paraguay
- Palestine
How they compare
Palestine currently reports 27.4% against 25.8% in Paraguay, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Palestine's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Palestine has been ahead every year.
Paraguay ranks 60th and Palestine ranks 57th of 130 countries.
Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.3% | 27.0% | 6.7% | Palestine |
| 2020s | 25.8% | 28.0% | 2.2% | Palestine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Paraguay or Palestine?
- Palestine, at 27.4% against 25.8% in Paraguay as of 2022.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Paraguay and Palestine?
- 1.6%, with Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Palestine?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2022.
- How do Paraguay and Palestine rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Paraguay ranks 60th and Palestine ranks 57th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.