Kazakhstan vs Switzerland: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population over time
- Kazakhstan
- Switzerland
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 2.0% against 2.0% in Switzerland, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Switzerland ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 124th and Switzerland ranks 124th of 126 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.4% | 2.6% | 0.2% | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 2.4% | 2.2% | 0.1% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Kazakhstan or Switzerland?
- Kazakhstan, at 2.0% against 2.0% in Switzerland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Kazakhstan and Switzerland?
- 0.0%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Switzerland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Switzerland rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Kazakhstan ranks 124th and Switzerland ranks 124th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.