IBRD only vs Lesotho: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) over time
- IBRD only
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 61.6% against 21.6% in IBRD only, a difference of 40.0%.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 2.8 times IBRD only's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.
IBRD only ranks 16th and Lesotho ranks 18th of 23 groups.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21.7% | 50.2% | 28.5% | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 23.5% | 57.2% | 33.7% | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, IBRD only or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 61.6% against 21.6% in IBRD only as of 2024.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between IBRD only and Lesotho?
- 40.0%, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Lesotho?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do IBRD only and Lesotho rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- IBRD only ranks 16th and Lesotho ranks 18th of 23 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.