Ethiopia vs Jamaica: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) over time
- Ethiopia
- Jamaica
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 60.1% against 55.8% in Jamaica, a difference of 4.3%.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 21st and Jamaica ranks 24th of 130 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 57.6% | 47.4% | 10.3% | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 59.0% | 54.4% | 4.6% | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Ethiopia or Jamaica?
- Ethiopia, at 60.1% against 55.8% in Jamaica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Ethiopia and Jamaica?
- 4.3%, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Jamaica?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Ethiopia and Jamaica rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Ethiopia ranks 21st and Jamaica ranks 24th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.