Denmark vs Slovakia: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population over time
- Denmark
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 7.5% against 6.9% in Denmark, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Slovakia ahead.
Denmark ranks 106th and Slovakia ranks 103rd of 126 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.5% | 5.5% | 0.0% | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 6.6% | 8.1% | 1.5% | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Denmark or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 7.5% against 6.9% in Denmark as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Denmark and Slovakia?
- 0.6%, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Slovakia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Denmark and Slovakia rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Denmark ranks 106th and Slovakia ranks 103rd of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.