Benin vs Yemen: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) over time
- Benin
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 74.4% against 65.6% in Benin, a difference of 8.8%.
That makes Yemen's figure about 1.1 times Benin's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Benin ahead.
Benin ranks 13th and Yemen ranks 10th of 130 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 1 and Yemen in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 63.0% | 47.5% | 15.5% | Benin |
| 2020s | 63.8% | 69.1% | 5.3% | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Benin or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 74.4% against 65.6% in Benin as of 2024.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Benin and Yemen?
- 8.8%, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Yemen?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Benin and Yemen rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Benin ranks 13th and Yemen ranks 10th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.