Belgium vs Montenegro: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) over time
- Belgium
- Montenegro
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 9.3% against 9.0% in Montenegro, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Montenegro ahead.
Belgium ranks 95th and Montenegro ranks 98th of 130 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.7% | 13.5% | 9.8% | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 7.1% | 11.7% | 4.7% | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Belgium or Montenegro?
- Belgium, at 9.3% against 9.0% in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Belgium and Montenegro?
- 0.3%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Montenegro?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Montenegro rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Belgium ranks 95th and Montenegro ranks 98th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.