Bangladesh vs Palestine: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) over time
- Bangladesh
- Palestine
How they compare
Palestine currently reports 27.4% against 26.2% in Bangladesh, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 59th and Palestine ranks 57th of 130 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 30.1% | 27.0% | 3.1% | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 28.4% | 27.7% | 0.6% | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Bangladesh or Palestine?
- Palestine, at 27.4% against 26.2% in Bangladesh as of 2022.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Bangladesh and Palestine?
- 1.2%, with Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Palestine?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Palestine rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Bangladesh ranks 59th and Palestine ranks 57th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.