Azerbaijan vs Romania: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) over time
- Azerbaijan
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 15.2% against 14.6% in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 79th and Romania ranks 77th of 130 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.1% | 15.8% | 7.7% | Romania |
| 2020s | 12.1% | 16.5% | 4.4% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Azerbaijan or Romania?
- Romania, at 15.2% against 14.6% in Azerbaijan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Azerbaijan and Romania?
- 0.6%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Romania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Azerbaijan and Romania rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Azerbaijan ranks 79th and Romania ranks 77th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.