Azerbaijan vs Estonia: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) over time
- Azerbaijan
- Estonia
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 14.6% against 13.1% in Estonia, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Estonia ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 79th and Estonia ranks 82nd of 130 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.1% | 8.3% | 0.1% | Estonia |
| 2020s | 12.1% | 9.9% | 2.2% | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Azerbaijan or Estonia?
- Azerbaijan, at 14.6% against 13.1% in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Azerbaijan and Estonia?
- 1.5%, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Estonia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Azerbaijan and Estonia rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Azerbaijan ranks 79th and Estonia ranks 82nd of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.