Armenia vs Netherlands: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population over time
- Armenia
- Netherlands
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 7.8% against 7.5% in Netherlands, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 100th and Netherlands ranks 103rd of 126 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.5% | 4.9% | 9.6% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 8.0% | 5.5% | 2.5% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Armenia or Netherlands?
- Armenia, at 7.8% against 7.5% in Netherlands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Armenia and Netherlands?
- 0.3%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Netherlands?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Netherlands rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Armenia ranks 100th and Netherlands ranks 103rd of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.