Algeria vs New Zealand: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)
Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%) over time
- Algeria
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 17.9% against 17.6% in Algeria, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Algeria ahead.
Algeria ranks 70th and New Zealand ranks 69th of 130 countries.
Algeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.9% | 12.5% | 7.4% | Algeria |
| 2020s | 18.5% | 16.2% | 2.3% | Algeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, Algeria or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 17.9% against 17.6% in Algeria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population between Algeria and New Zealand?
- 0.3%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and New Zealand?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Algeria and New Zealand rank globally for prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population?
- Algeria ranks 70th and New Zealand ranks 69th of 130 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.