Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Tuvalu: Population ages 0-14, male, per square kilometre

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
9.98 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
56.23 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
23rd
Tuvalu rank
24th

Population ages 0-14, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Tuvalu
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 56.23 units per square kilometre against 9.98 units per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 46.25 units per square kilometre.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 5.6 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 23rd and Tuvalu ranks 24th of 45 groups.

Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1960s 2.51 units per square kilometre 41.64 units per square kilometre 39.13 units per square kilometre Tuvalu
1970s 3.34 units per square kilometre 41.68 units per square kilometre 38.34 units per square kilometre Tuvalu
1980s 4.43 units per square kilometre 46.2 units per square kilometre 41.77 units per square kilometre Tuvalu
1990s 5.61 units per square kilometre 58.71 units per square kilometre 53.1 units per square kilometre Tuvalu
2000s 7.21 units per square kilometre 60.46 units per square kilometre 53.25 units per square kilometre Tuvalu
2010s 8.48 units per square kilometre 61.05 units per square kilometre 52.56 units per square kilometre Tuvalu
2020s 9.7 units per square kilometre 56.8 units per square kilometre 47.1 units per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 0-14, male, per square kilometre, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 56.23 units per square kilometre against 9.98 units per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 0-14, male, per square kilometre between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tuvalu?
46.25 units per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tuvalu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tuvalu rank globally for population ages 0-14, male, per square kilometre?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 23rd and Tuvalu ranks 24th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 0-14, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Tuvalu: Population ages 0-14, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-male-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-male-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/tuvalu/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Tuvalu: Population ages 0-14, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 0-14, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 0-14, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.