Bosnia and Herzegovina vs China: Low-birthweight babies
Bosnia and Herzegovina
5.2%
in 2020
China
5.0%
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
143rd
China rank
146th
Low-birthweight babies over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- China
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 5.2% against 5.0% in China, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was China ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 143rd and China ranks 146th of 157 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and China in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.1% | 5.5% | 0.4% | China |
| 2010s | 5.2% | 5.1% | 0.1% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 5.2% | 5.0% | 0.2% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher low-birthweight babies, Bosnia and Herzegovina or China?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 5.2% against 5.0% in China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in low-birthweight babies between Bosnia and Herzegovina and China?
- 0.2%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and China?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and China rank globally for low-birthweight babies?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 143rd and China ranks 146th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF-WHO Low birthweight estimates, UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), published as Low-birthweight babies (% of births). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Low-birthweight babies are newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams, with the measurement taken within the first hour of life, before significant postnatal weight loss has occurred.