Japan vs Lithuania: Health status - Regions — Crude mortality rate
Health status - Regions — Crude mortality rate over time
- Japan
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 12.98 Per 1 000 inhabitants against 12.96 Per 1 000 inhabitants in Japan, a difference of 0.02 Per 1 000 inhabitants.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 7th and Lithuania ranks 6th of 46 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.36 Per 1 000 inhabitants | 11.7 Per 1 000 inhabitants | 4.35 Per 1 000 inhabitants | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 8.22 Per 1 000 inhabitants | 12.62 Per 1 000 inhabitants | 4.4 Per 1 000 inhabitants | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 10.15 Per 1 000 inhabitants | 13.82 Per 1 000 inhabitants | 3.67 Per 1 000 inhabitants | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 12.1 Per 1 000 inhabitants | 14.74 Per 1 000 inhabitants | 2.64 Per 1 000 inhabitants | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher health status - regions — crude mortality rate, Japan or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 12.98 Per 1 000 inhabitants against 12.96 Per 1 000 inhabitants in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in health status - regions — crude mortality rate between Japan and Lithuania?
- 0.02 Per 1 000 inhabitants, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Lithuania?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Lithuania rank globally for health status - regions — crude mortality rate?
- Japan ranks 7th and Lithuania ranks 6th of 46 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Health status - Regions — Crude mortality rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides indicators on health status in in large regions (TL2), and small regions (TL3) when data is available. Indicators include life expectancy, raw mortality rate, age-adjusted mortality rate and infant mortality rate. Data definition and source Life expectancy at birth is defined as how long, on average, a newborn can expect to live, if current death rates do not change. Crude mortality rate is defined as the ratio of the number of deaths during the year to the average population in that year. The indicator is expressed per 1 000 inhabitants. Age-adjusted mortality rate represents the death rate that would be expected in a given region if its population had the same age distribution as the OECD average, enabling comparability across different countries and regions. For small TL3 regions, where this indicator may vary, it is advisable to calculate the average values over a minimum period of three years for a more reliable assessment. Infant mortality rate is the number of deaths of children less than one year of age per 1 000 live births. Data is collected from Eurostat (reg_hlth) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. Definition of regions Regions are subnational units below national boundaries. OECD countries have two regional levels: large regions (territorial level 2 or TL2) and small regions (territorial level 3 or TL3). For more information, see the OECD Territorial grid (pdf) and the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats. Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.