Malawi vs Sur: External health expenditure (EXT) as percentage of current health
Malawi
65.5%
in 2023
Sur
5.2%
in 2023
Malawi rank
2nd
Sur rank
1st
External health expenditure (EXT) as percentage of current health over time
- Malawi
- Sur
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 65.5% against 5.2% in Sur, a difference of 60.3%.
That makes Malawi's figure about 12.7 times Sur's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 2nd and Sur ranks 1st of 194 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.2% | 5.5% | 48.7% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 60.8% | 1.8% | 59.0% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 61.5% | 2.6% | 58.8% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external health expenditure (ext) as percentage of current health, Malawi or Sur?
- Malawi, at 65.5% against 5.2% in Sur as of 2023.
- What is the difference in external health expenditure (ext) as percentage of current health between Malawi and Sur?
- 60.3%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sur?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Sur rank globally for external health expenditure (ext) as percentage of current health?
- Malawi ranks 2nd and Sur ranks 1st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as External health expenditure (EXT) as percentage of current health expenditure (CHE) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.