Reported cases of measles, per unit of GDP in Chile
Chile: Reported cases of measles, per unit of GDP was 0 Cases per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Reported cases of measles, per unit of GDP in Chile, 1974–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in Cases per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for reported cases of measles, per unit of gdp in Chile is 0 Cases per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 51 years on record.
That represents a change of down 100.0% on the previous year and down 100.0% over five years.
Over the whole period, reported cases of measles, per unit of gdp in Chile peaked at 0 Cases per US$ of GDP in 1988 and was at its lowest, 0 Cases per US$ of GDP, in 1994.
That places Chile 145th out of 203 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Reported cases of measles, per unit of GDP in Chile, year by year
| Year | Cases per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1974 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1975 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | +6.3% |
| 1976 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -77.6% |
| 1977 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -69.2% |
| 1978 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | +1162.5% |
| 1979 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | +64.5% |
| 1980 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -91.6% |
| 1981 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | +42.8% |
| 1982 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | +158.1% |
| 1983 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -31.6% |
| 1984 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -26.8% |
| 1985 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | +298.1% |
| 1986 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -31.4% |
| 1987 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -82.3% |
| 1988 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | +1384.2% |
| 1989 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -74.9% |
| 1990 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -86.4% |
| 1991 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -6.3% |
| 1992 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -100.0% |
| 1993 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 1994 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -100.0% |
| 1995 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1996 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1997 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1998 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -89.2% |
| 1999 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | +460.5% |
| 2000 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -100.0% |
| 2001 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2002 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2003 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2004 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -100.0% |
| 2005 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2006 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2007 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2008 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2009 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2010 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -100.0% |
| 2011 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2012 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -100.0% |
| 2013 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2014 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2015 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2016 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -100.0% |
| 2017 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2018 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2019 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -51.3% |
| 2020 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -80.1% |
| 2021 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -100.0% |
| 2022 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2023 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2024 | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | -100.0% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 0 Cases per US$ of GDP is below the median for high income countries, which is 0 Cases per US$ of GDP. (74 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Reported cases of measles, per unit of GDP in Chile changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | +1384.2% | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP |
| 1978 | +1162.5% | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP |
| 1999 | +460.5% | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP |
| 1985 | +298.1% | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP |
| 1982 | +158.1% | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 6 |
| 1980s | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 0 Cases per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 142 New Zealand 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 143 Mexico 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 144 Brazil 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Aruba 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Andorra 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Argentina 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 American Samoa 0 Cases per US$ of GDP
- 145 Antigua and Barbuda 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Bahamas 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Belize 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Barbados 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Brunei 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Bhutan 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Colombia 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Cape Verde 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Costa Rica 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Cuba 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Cayman Islands 0 Cases per US$ of GDP
- 145 Dominica 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Dominican Republic 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Ecuador 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Guinea-Bissau 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Grenada 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Guatemala 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Guam 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Guyana 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Honduras 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Haiti 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Israel 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Jamaica 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Kiribati 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Saint Lucia 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Latvia 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Macao 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Marshall Islands 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Northern Mariana Islands 0 Cases per US$ of GDP
- 145 Mauritius 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 New Caledonia 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Nicaragua 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Nauru 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Panama 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Palau 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Paraguay 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 French Polynesia 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Solomon Islands 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 El Salvador 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 San Marino 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Sao Tome and Principe 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Suriname 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Eswatini 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Tajikistan 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Turkmenistan 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Tonga 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Trinidad and Tobago 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Tuvalu 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Uruguay 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Venezuela 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Vanuatu 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Samoa 0 Cases per US$ of GDP compare
More health data for Chile
- Un projection of annual infant deaths, annual growth rate -1.71 % change on previous year (2100)
- Heat deaths vs projected death rates, annual growth rate 0.4062 % change on previous year (2090)
- Estimated changes in temperature-related death rates compared to projected death rates 1,755 deaths per 1,000 people (2090)
- Number of infants who die before age 1 115 deaths (2100)
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled 0 (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, annual growth rate -3.22 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per capita 0.0224 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, annual growth rate -3.16 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is reported cases of measles, per unit of gdp in Chile?
- Reported cases of measles, per unit of gdp in Chile was 0 Cases per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest reported cases of measles, per unit of gdp recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 0 Cases per US$ of GDP in 1988.
- What is the lowest reported cases of measles, per unit of gdp recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 Cases per US$ of GDP in 1994.
- How does Chile rank for reported cases of measles, per unit of gdp?
- Chile ranks 145th out of 203 countries with data for 2024.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Reported cases of measles, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Reported cases of measles divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Reported cases of measles ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Reported cases of measles World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Reported cases of measles divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.