Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB in Lower-middle income (World Bank)

Lower-middle income (World Bank): Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB was 85.0% in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)
85.0%
Change on year
down 1.2%
Rank
4th
of 11 groups
All-time high
92.0%
in 2020
All-time low
1.0%
in 2006
Years of data
20
2005–2024

Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB in Lower-middle income (World Bank), 2005–2024

0204060801002005201420242005: 1.22006: 0.972007: 2.32008: 3.52009: 2.92010: 1.52011: 1.82012: 3.12013: 122014: 652015: 602016: 652017: 762018: 652019: 852020: 922021: 762022: 832023: 862024: 85

Source: World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory.

Analysis

The most recent figure for previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb in Lower-middle income (World Bank) is 85.0%, measured in 2024.

The figure is down 1.2% on the previous year and up 30.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb in Lower-middle income (World Bank) peaked at 92.0% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 1.0%, in 2006.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB in Lower-middle income (World Bank), year by year

Annual values for Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%) in Lower-middle income (World Bank), 2005 to 2024.
Year Value Change
2005 1.2%
2006 1.0% -19.2%
2007 2.3% +137.1%
2008 3.5% +52.2%
2009 2.9% -17.1%
2010 1.5% -48.3%
2011 1.8% +20.0%
2012 3.1% +72.2%
2013 12.0% +287.1%
2014 65.0% +441.7%
2015 60.0% -7.7%
2016 65.0% +8.3%
2017 76.0% +16.9%
2018 65.0% -14.5%
2019 85.0% +30.8%
2020 92.0% +8.2%
2021 76.0% -17.4%
2022 83.0% +9.2%
2023 86.0% +3.6%
2024 85.0% -1.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.2% 1.0% 3.5% 5
2010s 43.4% 1.5% 85.0% 10
2020s 84.4% 76.0% 92.0% 5

Countries ranked near Lower-middle income (World Bank)

  1. 1 Côte d'Ivoire 100.0% compare
  2. 1 Zambia 100.0% compare
  3. 1 Lithuania 100.0% compare
  4. 1 Slovenia 100.0% compare
  5. 1 Sri Lanka 100.0% compare
  6. 1 Bangladesh 100.0% compare
  7. 1 Fiji 100.0% compare
  8. 1 Norway 100.0% compare
  9. 1 Kuwait 100.0% compare
  10. 1 Luxembourg 100.0% compare
  11. 1 Armenia 100.0% compare
  12. 1 Gambia 100.0% compare
  13. 1 Ghana 100.0% compare
  14. 1 Yemen 100.0% compare
  15. 1 Oman 100.0% compare
  16. 1 Brunei Darussalam 100.0% compare
  17. 1 Togo 100.0% compare
  18. 1 Israel 100.0% compare
  19. 1 Cameroon 100.0% compare
  20. 1 Jamaica 100.0% compare
  21. 1 Eritrea 100.0% compare
  22. 1 Cyprus 100.0% compare
  23. 1 Montenegro 100.0% compare
  24. 1 Sao Tome and Principe 100.0% compare
  25. 1 Viet Nam 100.0% compare
  26. 1 Belize 100.0% compare
  27. 1 Marshall Islands 100.0% compare
  28. 1 Republic of Moldova 100.0% compare
  29. 1 Comoros 100.0% compare
  30. 1 Kazakhstan 100.0% compare
  31. 1 Lao People's Democratic Republic 100.0% compare
  32. 1 Antigua and Barbuda 100.0% compare
  33. 1 Afghanistan 100.0% compare
  34. 1 Benin 100.0% compare
  35. 1 Jordan 100.0% compare
  36. 1 Puerto Rico 100.0% compare
  37. 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 100.0% compare
  38. 1 Mauritius 100.0% compare
  39. 1 Congo 100.0% compare
  40. 1 Eswatini 100.0% compare
  41. 1 Micronesia, Federated States of 100.0% compare
  42. 1 Iceland 100.0% compare
  43. 1 Belarus 100.0% compare
  44. 1 Albania 100.0% compare
  45. 1 Mauritania 100.0% compare
  46. 1 Bhutan 100.0% compare
  47. 1 Tuvalu 100.0% compare
  48. 1 Malta 100.0% compare
  49. 1 Iraq 100.0% compare
  50. 1 Republic of Korea 100.0% compare
  51. 1 Papua New Guinea 100.0% compare
  52. 1 Bahamas 100.0% compare
  53. 1 Zimbabwe 100.0% compare
  54. 1 Andorra 100.0% compare
  55. 1 Turkmenistan 100.0% compare

See the full ranking of 193 places →

More health data for Lower-middle income (World Bank)

All data for Lower-middle income (World Bank) →

Frequently asked questions

What is previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb in Lower-middle income (World Bank)?
Previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb in Lower-middle income (World Bank) was 85.0% in 2024, according to World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory.
What is the highest previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb recorded in Lower-middle income (World Bank)?
The highest recorded value was 92.0% in 2020.
What is the lowest previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb recorded in Lower-middle income (World Bank)?
The lowest recorded value was 1.0% in 2006.
How does Lower-middle income (World Bank) rank for previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb?
Lower-middle income (World Bank) ranks 4th out of 11 groups with data for 2024.
Is previously treated cases tested for rr-/mdr-tb rising or falling in Lower-middle income (World Bank)?
Over the last ten years it is up 30.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Lower-middle income (World Bank) data come from?
The figures come from World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as part of Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB in Lower-middle income (World Bank). Statizoid, drawing on World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/stat/previously-treated-cases-tested-for-rr-mdr-tb-percent/lower-middle-income-world-bank/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/stat/previously-treated-cases-tested-for-rr-mdr-tb-percent/lower-middle-income-world-bank/">Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB in Lower-middle income (World Bank)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%)
Source
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (WHO)
Coverage
193 places, 3,089 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed