Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income
Lower middle income: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre was 0.7822 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
0.7822 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 3.6%
Rank
10th
of 43 groups
All-time high
0.7822 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.1109 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income stood at 0.7822 units per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 3.6% on the previous year and up 29.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income peaked at 0.7822 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.1109 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
Lower middle income ranks 10th of 43 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.1109 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.1194 units per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1963 | 0.1283 units per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1964 | 0.1352 units per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1965 | 0.1396 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1966 | 0.1419 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1967 | 0.142 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1968 | 0.1416 units per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1969 | 0.1432 units per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1970 | 0.1473 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1971 | 0.1533 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1972 | 0.1618 units per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1973 | 0.1717 units per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1974 | 0.1806 units per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1975 | 0.188 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1976 | 0.1939 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1977 | 0.1985 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1978 | 0.2027 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1979 | 0.208 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1980 | 0.2147 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1981 | 0.2225 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1982 | 0.2316 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1983 | 0.2414 units per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1984 | 0.2508 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1985 | 0.2596 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1986 | 0.268 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1987 | 0.2759 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1988 | 0.2836 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1989 | 0.2915 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1990 | 0.2999 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1991 | 0.3083 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1992 | 0.3045 units per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1993 | 0.3135 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1994 | 0.323 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1995 | 0.3329 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1996 | 0.3432 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1997 | 0.3539 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1998 | 0.3651 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1999 | 0.3769 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2000 | 0.3891 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2001 | 0.4024 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2002 | 0.4164 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2003 | 0.4312 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2004 | 0.4467 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2005 | 0.4625 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2006 | 0.4788 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2007 | 0.4955 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2008 | 0.5125 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2009 | 0.5296 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2010 | 0.5468 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2011 | 0.5644 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2012 | 0.5831 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2013 | 0.6022 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2014 | 0.6201 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2015 | 0.6362 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2016 | 0.6514 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2017 | 0.666 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2018 | 0.6814 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2019 | 0.6992 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2020 | 0.7192 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2021 | 0.7352 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2022 | 0.7548 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2023 | 0.7822 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1336 units per square kilometre | 0.1109 units per square kilometre | 0.1432 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.1806 units per square kilometre | 0.1473 units per square kilometre | 0.208 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.2539 units per square kilometre | 0.2147 units per square kilometre | 0.2915 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.3321 units per square kilometre | 0.2999 units per square kilometre | 0.3769 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.4565 units per square kilometre | 0.3891 units per square kilometre | 0.5296 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.6251 units per square kilometre | 0.5468 units per square kilometre | 0.6992 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.7479 units per square kilometre | 0.7192 units per square kilometre | 0.7822 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Lower middle income
- 7 Bermuda 27.35 units per square kilometre compare
- 8 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 14.15 units per square kilometre compare
- 9 San Marino 12.97 units per square kilometre compare
- 10 Netherlands 12.18 units per square kilometre compare
- 11 Japan 11.65 units per square kilometre compare
- 12 Barbados 11.36 units per square kilometre compare
- 13 Aruba 10.26 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Lower middle income
- Population ages 0-14, female, per capita 0.1434 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 80 and above, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 80 and above, male, per capita 0.0036 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 0-14, female, annual growth rate 0.1036 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 0-14, female, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 0-14, male, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 0-14, total, annual growth rate 0.0357 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 0-14, male, per capita 0.1516 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 80 and above, male, annual growth rate 4.28 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 0-14, male, annual growth rate -0.0284 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income?
- Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre in Lower middle income was 0.7822 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre recorded in Lower middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 0.7822 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre recorded in Lower middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1109 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Lower middle income rank for population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre?
- Lower middle income ranks 10th out of 43 groups with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre rising or falling in Lower middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 29.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lower middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 75-79, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 75-79, female ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 75-79, female World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 75-79, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.