Population ages 65 and above, male, per unit of GDP in IDA blend
IDA blend: Population ages 65 and above, male, per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Population ages 65 and above, male, per unit of GDP in IDA blend, 1960–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
IDA blend recorded 0 units per US$ of GDP for population ages 65 and above, male, per unit of gdp in 2025.
That represents a change of down 8.6% on the previous year and up 15.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 65 and above, male, per unit of gdp in IDA blend peaked at 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP in 1960 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2019.
That places IDA blend 9th out of 44 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 65 and above, male, per unit of GDP in IDA blend, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1961 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 1962 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
| 1963 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -3.3% |
| 1964 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 1965 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -4.8% |
| 1966 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 1967 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +2.1% |
| 1968 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 1969 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -9.4% |
| 1970 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -23.7% |
| 1971 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | +9.4% |
| 1972 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 1973 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 1974 | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | -27.6% |
| 1975 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.1% |
| 1976 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -14.4% |
| 1977 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 1978 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 1979 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.3% |
| 1980 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -18.4% |
| 1981 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -43.5% |
| 1982 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +12.8% |
| 1983 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +34.4% |
| 1984 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +18.9% |
| 1985 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.6% |
| 1986 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +11.5% |
| 1987 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.0% |
| 1988 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.1% |
| 1989 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +6.2% |
| 1990 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.7% |
| 1991 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.5% |
| 1992 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +6.0% |
| 1993 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.7% |
| 1994 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -26.5% |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -16.3% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.0% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.2% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +81.8% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -14.5% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.8% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.5% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.4% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -14.9% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -16.7% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.4% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.4% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +9.7% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -9.8% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.2% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.3% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.3% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +8.8% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.5% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.8% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -14.5% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +10.1% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.0% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.3% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +18.1% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +17.5% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Population ages 65 and above, male, per unit of GDP in IDA blend changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | +81.8% | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near IDA blend
- 6 Nepal 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 7 Syria 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 8 East Timor 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 9 Yemen 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 10 Somalia 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 11 Democratic Republic of Congo 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 12 Sierra Leone 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
More health data for IDA blend
- Age dependency ratio, young 64.9% (2025)
- Population ages 15-64, total, annual growth rate 2.54 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 15-64, male, per capita 0.2948 units per person (2025)
- Population, male 347.99 million (2025)
- Population ages 15-64, male, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population, female 49.6% (2025)
- Population ages 15-64, male, annual growth rate 2.54 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 15-64, female, per capita 0.2892 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 15-64, female, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Age dependency ratio, old 6.4% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 65 and above, male, per unit of gdp in IDA blend?
- Population ages 65 and above, male, per unit of gdp in IDA blend was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 65 and above, male, per unit of gdp recorded in IDA blend?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP in 1960.
- What is the lowest population ages 65 and above, male, per unit of gdp recorded in IDA blend?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2019.
- How does IDA blend rank for population ages 65 and above, male, per unit of gdp?
- IDA blend ranks 9th out of 44 groups with data for 2025.
- Is population ages 65 and above, male, per unit of gdp rising or falling in IDA blend?
- Over the last ten years it is up 15.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this IDA blend data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 65 and above, male, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 66 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 65 and above, male divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 65 and above, male ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Population ages 65 and above, male World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN), publisher: UN Population Division
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 65 and above, male divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.