Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre was 0.2574 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe is 0.2574 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.2% on the previous year and up 30.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe peaked at 0.2706 units per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.0652 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Zimbabwe 179th out of 215 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0652 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0663 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1963 | 0.0673 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1964 | 0.0684 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1965 | 0.0696 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1966 | 0.0709 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0725 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1968 | 0.0741 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1969 | 0.0756 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1970 | 0.0774 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1971 | 0.08 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1972 | 0.0832 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0871 units per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1974 | 0.0915 units per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1975 | 0.0965 units per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1976 | 0.1017 units per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1977 | 0.108 units per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1978 | 0.1179 units per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1979 | 0.1313 units per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 1980 | 0.1391 units per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1981 | 0.1402 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1982 | 0.1399 units per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1983 | 0.136 units per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1984 | 0.129 units per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1985 | 0.1259 units per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1986 | 0.1277 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1987 | 0.1304 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1988 | 0.1347 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1989 | 0.1401 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1990 | 0.1465 units per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1991 | 0.1536 units per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1992 | 0.1653 units per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1993 | 0.1812 units per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1994 | 0.1957 units per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1995 | 0.2077 units per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1996 | 0.2166 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1997 | 0.2184 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1998 | 0.213 units per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 1999 | 0.2053 units per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2000 | 0.1973 units per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 2001 | 0.1901 units per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 2002 | 0.184 units per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2003 | 0.1792 units per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2004 | 0.1762 units per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2005 | 0.1749 units per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2006 | 0.1746 units per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2007 | 0.1756 units per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2008 | 0.178 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2009 | 0.1813 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2010 | 0.1852 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2011 | 0.1895 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2012 | 0.194 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2013 | 0.1976 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2014 | 0.2062 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2015 | 0.2205 units per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2016 | 0.2349 units per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2017 | 0.2488 units per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2018 | 0.2623 units per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2019 | 0.2702 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2020 | 0.2706 units per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2021 | 0.2676 units per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2022 | 0.2631 units per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2023 | 0.2574 units per square kilometre | -2.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.07 units per square kilometre | 0.0652 units per square kilometre | 0.0756 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0975 units per square kilometre | 0.0774 units per square kilometre | 0.1313 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1343 units per square kilometre | 0.1259 units per square kilometre | 0.1402 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1903 units per square kilometre | 0.1465 units per square kilometre | 0.2184 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1811 units per square kilometre | 0.1746 units per square kilometre | 0.1973 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.2209 units per square kilometre | 0.1852 units per square kilometre | 0.2702 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.2647 units per square kilometre | 0.2574 units per square kilometre | 0.2706 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 176 Afghanistan 0.2851 units per square kilometre compare
- 177 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 0.2784 units per square kilometre compare
- 178 Bhutan 0.26 units per square kilometre compare
- 180 Algeria 0.2503 units per square kilometre compare
- 181 Vanuatu 0.2208 units per square kilometre compare
- 182 Solomon Islands 0.2076 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Zimbabwe
- Un projection of annual infant deaths, annual growth rate -1.39 % change on previous year (2100)
- Heat deaths vs projected death rates, annual growth rate 1.11 % change on previous year (2090)
- Estimated changes in temperature-related death rates compared to projected death rates 874.6 deaths per 1,000 people (2090)
- Number of infants who die before age 1 4,457 deaths (2100)
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled 2 (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, annual growth rate 0.9632 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per capita 0.0689 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, annual growth rate 0.9673 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe?
- Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe was 0.2574 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2706 units per square kilometre in 2020.
- What is the lowest population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0652 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre?
- Zimbabwe ranks 179th out of 215 countries with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is up 30.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 65-69, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 65-69, male ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 65-69, male World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 65-69, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.