Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre was 1.38 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
1.38 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 1.8%
Rank
11th
of 43 groups
All-time high
1.38 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.237 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Upper middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Upper middle income is 1.38 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 1.8% on the previous year and up 61.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Upper middle income peaked at 1.38 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.237 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Upper middle income 11th out of 43 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.237 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.24 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1963 | 0.2439 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1964 | 0.2474 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1965 | 0.2526 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1966 | 0.2604 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1967 | 0.2698 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1968 | 0.2805 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1969 | 0.292 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1970 | 0.3023 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1971 | 0.3114 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1972 | 0.3195 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1973 | 0.3271 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1974 | 0.3357 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1975 | 0.3452 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1976 | 0.3542 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1977 | 0.3636 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1978 | 0.3747 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1979 | 0.3868 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1980 | 0.3972 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1981 | 0.4056 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1982 | 0.4131 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1983 | 0.4192 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1984 | 0.4255 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1985 | 0.4356 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1986 | 0.4498 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1987 | 0.4661 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1988 | 0.4842 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1989 | 0.5045 units per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1990 | 0.5248 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1991 | 0.5432 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1992 | 0.5091 units per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1993 | 0.5295 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1994 | 0.5489 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1995 | 0.5669 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1996 | 0.5854 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1997 | 0.6036 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1998 | 0.6222 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1999 | 0.6396 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2000 | 0.6554 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2001 | 0.6731 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2002 | 0.6913 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2003 | 0.7065 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2004 | 0.7177 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2005 | 0.7277 units per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2006 | 0.7354 units per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2007 | 0.7419 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2008 | 0.7455 units per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2009 | 0.7527 units per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2010 | 0.765 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2011 | 0.7833 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2012 | 0.8136 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2013 | 0.8549 units per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2014 | 0.9041 units per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2015 | 0.964 units per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 2016 | 1.03 units per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 2017 | 1.09 units per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2018 | 1.16 units per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2019 | 1.22 units per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2020 | 1.28 units per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2021 | 1.32 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2022 | 1.35 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2023 | 1.38 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2582 units per square kilometre | 0.237 units per square kilometre | 0.292 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.342 units per square kilometre | 0.3023 units per square kilometre | 0.3868 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.4401 units per square kilometre | 0.3972 units per square kilometre | 0.5045 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.5673 units per square kilometre | 0.5091 units per square kilometre | 0.6396 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.7147 units per square kilometre | 0.6554 units per square kilometre | 0.7527 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.959 units per square kilometre | 0.765 units per square kilometre | 1.22 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.33 units per square kilometre | 1.28 units per square kilometre | 1.38 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 8 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 34.32 units per square kilometre compare
- 9 Bahrain 18.37 units per square kilometre compare
- 10 Barbados 17.22 units per square kilometre compare
- 11 Maldives 17.04 units per square kilometre compare
- 12 Aruba 17 units per square kilometre compare
- 13 Bangladesh 16.42 units per square kilometre compare
- 14 Korea 16.28 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Upper middle income
- Population ages 35-39, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, male, annual growth rate 1.94 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, per capita 0.0359 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, annual growth rate 1.71 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per capita 0.0413 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, annual growth rate 2.11 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, female, per capita 0.0394 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 30-34, female, annual growth rate -3.39 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Upper middle income?
- Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Upper middle income was 1.38 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 1.38 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.237 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Upper middle income rank for population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre?
- Upper middle income ranks 11th out of 43 groups with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 61.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 65-69, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 65-69, male ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 65-69, male World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 65-69, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.