Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in East Timor
East Timor: Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre was 0.7421 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
0.7421 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 0.8%
World rank
139th
of 215 countries
All-time high
0.8868 units per square kilometre
in 2016
All-time low
0.139 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in East Timor, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
East Timor recorded 0.7421 units per square kilometre for population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in 2023.
The figure is up 0.8% on the previous year and down 14.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in East Timor peaked at 0.8868 units per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0.139 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places East Timor 139th out of 215 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in East Timor, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.139 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.1463 units per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1963 | 0.1566 units per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1964 | 0.1673 units per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1965 | 0.1773 units per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1966 | 0.1871 units per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1967 | 0.1968 units per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1968 | 0.2062 units per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1969 | 0.2149 units per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1970 | 0.2229 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1971 | 0.23 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1972 | 0.2362 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1973 | 0.2418 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1974 | 0.2458 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1975 | 0.2459 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.2436 units per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1977 | 0.2414 units per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1978 | 0.2389 units per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 1979 | 0.2374 units per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1980 | 0.2391 units per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1981 | 0.2435 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1982 | 0.2486 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1983 | 0.253 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1984 | 0.2554 units per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1985 | 0.2561 units per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1986 | 0.2554 units per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1987 | 0.2541 units per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1988 | 0.2539 units per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1989 | 0.256 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1990 | 0.262 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1991 | 0.2704 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1992 | 0.2795 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1993 | 0.2888 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1994 | 0.2983 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1995 | 0.3079 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1996 | 0.3178 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1997 | 0.3284 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1998 | 0.3402 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1999 | 0.3043 units per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 2000 | 0.2772 units per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 2001 | 0.3102 units per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2002 | 0.3453 units per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 2003 | 0.3704 units per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 2004 | 0.3861 units per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2005 | 0.4162 units per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2006 | 0.4657 units per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2007 | 0.5258 units per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 2008 | 0.6002 units per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 2009 | 0.6911 units per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 2010 | 0.7783 units per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2011 | 0.8307 units per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2012 | 0.8533 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2013 | 0.8659 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2014 | 0.8732 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2015 | 0.8808 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2016 | 0.8868 units per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2017 | 0.8808 units per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2018 | 0.8586 units per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2019 | 0.8248 units per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 2020 | 0.7871 units per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 2021 | 0.753 units per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 2022 | 0.7364 units per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2023 | 0.7421 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
East Timor compared with similar countries
- East Timor's 0.7421 units per square kilometre is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.6166 units per square kilometre, 1.2× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- East Timor's 0.7421 units per square kilometre is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 1.69 units per square kilometre, 44% of the median. (37 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1768 units per square kilometre | 0.139 units per square kilometre | 0.2149 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.2384 units per square kilometre | 0.2229 units per square kilometre | 0.2459 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.2515 units per square kilometre | 0.2391 units per square kilometre | 0.2561 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.2998 units per square kilometre | 0.262 units per square kilometre | 0.3402 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.4388 units per square kilometre | 0.2772 units per square kilometre | 0.6911 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.8533 units per square kilometre | 0.7783 units per square kilometre | 0.8868 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.7547 units per square kilometre | 0.7364 units per square kilometre | 0.7871 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Timor
- 136 Latvia 0.7694 units per square kilometre compare
- 137 Benin 0.7522 units per square kilometre compare
- 138 Sierra Leone 0.7444 units per square kilometre compare
- 140 Senegal 0.6862 units per square kilometre compare
- 141 Ethiopia 0.6802 units per square kilometre compare
- 142 Sweden 0.6618 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for East Timor
- Un projection of annual infant deaths, annual growth rate -1.22 % change on previous year (2100)
- Heat deaths vs projected death rates, annual growth rate 0.894 % change on previous year (2090)
- Un projection of annual infant deaths 162 (2100)
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled 0 (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, annual growth rate -2.67 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, female, per capita 0.051 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, annual growth rate -2.04 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 00-04, male, per capita 0.0538 units per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in East Timor?
- Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in East Timor was 0.7421 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre recorded in East Timor?
- The highest recorded value was 0.8868 units per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre recorded in East Timor?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.139 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does East Timor rank for population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre?
- East Timor ranks 139th out of 215 countries with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre rising or falling in East Timor?
- Over the last ten years it is down 14.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Timor data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 65-69, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 65-69, male ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 65-69, male World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 65-69, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.