Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Lower middle income
Lower middle income: Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre was 1.74 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
1.74 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 3.4%
Rank
9th
of 43 groups
All-time high
1.74 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.317 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Lower middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Lower middle income is 1.74 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
The figure is up 3.4% on the previous year and up 52.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Lower middle income peaked at 1.74 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.317 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Lower middle income 9th out of 43 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Lower middle income, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.317 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.3321 units per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1963 | 0.3487 units per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1964 | 0.3639 units per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1965 | 0.3765 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1966 | 0.3866 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1967 | 0.3945 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1968 | 0.4016 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1969 | 0.4098 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1970 | 0.4198 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1971 | 0.4301 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1972 | 0.442 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1973 | 0.4558 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1974 | 0.4691 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1975 | 0.4815 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1976 | 0.4928 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1977 | 0.5033 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1978 | 0.5133 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1979 | 0.5242 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1980 | 0.5361 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1981 | 0.5486 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1982 | 0.5618 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1983 | 0.5756 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1984 | 0.5895 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1985 | 0.6038 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1986 | 0.6186 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1987 | 0.6334 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1988 | 0.6487 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1989 | 0.665 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1990 | 0.683 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1991 | 0.7016 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1992 | 0.6922 units per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1993 | 0.7116 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1994 | 0.7312 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1995 | 0.7501 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1996 | 0.7685 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1997 | 0.7862 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1998 | 0.8036 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1999 | 0.821 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2000 | 0.8381 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2001 | 0.8563 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2002 | 0.8755 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2003 | 0.8953 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2004 | 0.9144 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2005 | 0.9326 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2006 | 0.9505 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2007 | 0.9686 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2008 | 0.9883 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2009 | 1.01 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2010 | 1.04 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2011 | 1.07 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2012 | 1.11 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2013 | 1.14 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2014 | 1.19 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2015 | 1.25 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2016 | 1.31 units per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2017 | 1.38 units per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2018 | 1.45 units per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2019 | 1.52 units per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2020 | 1.58 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2021 | 1.63 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2022 | 1.68 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2023 | 1.74 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3701 units per square kilometre | 0.317 units per square kilometre | 0.4098 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.4732 units per square kilometre | 0.4198 units per square kilometre | 0.5242 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.5981 units per square kilometre | 0.5361 units per square kilometre | 0.665 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.7449 units per square kilometre | 0.683 units per square kilometre | 0.821 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.9231 units per square kilometre | 0.8381 units per square kilometre | 1.01 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.25 units per square kilometre | 1.04 units per square kilometre | 1.52 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.66 units per square kilometre | 1.58 units per square kilometre | 1.74 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Lower middle income
- 6 Malta 48.44 units per square kilometre compare
- 7 Bermuda 37.65 units per square kilometre compare
- 8 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 34.32 units per square kilometre compare
- 9 Bahrain 18.37 units per square kilometre compare
- 10 Barbados 17.22 units per square kilometre compare
- 11 Maldives 17.04 units per square kilometre compare
- 12 Aruba 17 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Lower middle income
- Population ages 35-39, female, per capita 0.0347 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, male, annual growth rate 2.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, per capita 0.031 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, annual growth rate 2.83 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per capita 0.0359 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, annual growth rate 1.33 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 30-34, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Lower middle income?
- Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Lower middle income was 1.74 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre recorded in Lower middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 1.74 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre recorded in Lower middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.317 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Lower middle income rank for population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre?
- Lower middle income ranks 9th out of 43 groups with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre rising or falling in Lower middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 52.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Lower middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 65-69, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 65-69, male ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 65-69, male World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 65-69, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.