Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Low & middle income
Low & middle income: Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre was 1.26 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
1.26 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 2.5%
Rank
13th
of 43 groups
All-time high
1.26 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.2326 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Low & middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Low & middle income stood at 1.26 units per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.5% on the previous year and up 56.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Low & middle income peaked at 1.26 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.2326 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
Low & middle income ranks 13th of 43 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Low & middle income, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.2326 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.2385 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1963 | 0.2454 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1964 | 0.2517 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1965 | 0.2583 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1966 | 0.2659 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1967 | 0.2738 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1968 | 0.2823 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1969 | 0.2915 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1970 | 0.3006 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1971 | 0.3089 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1972 | 0.3171 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1973 | 0.3255 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1974 | 0.3344 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1975 | 0.3436 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1976 | 0.3523 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1977 | 0.3609 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1978 | 0.3705 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1979 | 0.3809 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1980 | 0.3905 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1981 | 0.399 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1982 | 0.4072 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1983 | 0.4148 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1984 | 0.4226 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1985 | 0.4327 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1986 | 0.4454 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1987 | 0.4592 units per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1988 | 0.4744 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1989 | 0.491 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1990 | 0.508 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1991 | 0.5241 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1992 | 0.5048 units per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 1993 | 0.515 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1994 | 0.5318 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1995 | 0.5477 units per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1996 | 0.5637 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1997 | 0.5796 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1998 | 0.5956 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1999 | 0.6111 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2000 | 0.6256 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2001 | 0.6416 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2002 | 0.6582 units per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2003 | 0.6733 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2004 | 0.6844 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2005 | 0.6958 units per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2006 | 0.706 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2007 | 0.7153 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2008 | 0.7234 units per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2009 | 0.7344 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2010 | 0.7497 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2011 | 0.7698 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2012 | 0.7721 units per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2013 | 0.8055 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2014 | 0.8458 units per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2015 | 0.895 units per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2016 | 0.9471 units per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2017 | 1 units per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2018 | 1.06 units per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 2019 | 1.11 units per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2020 | 1.16 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2021 | 1.2 units per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2022 | 1.23 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2023 | 1.26 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.26 units per square kilometre | 0.2326 units per square kilometre | 0.2915 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.3395 units per square kilometre | 0.3006 units per square kilometre | 0.3809 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.4337 units per square kilometre | 0.3905 units per square kilometre | 0.491 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.5481 units per square kilometre | 0.5048 units per square kilometre | 0.6111 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.6858 units per square kilometre | 0.6256 units per square kilometre | 0.7344 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.896 units per square kilometre | 0.7497 units per square kilometre | 1.11 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.21 units per square kilometre | 1.16 units per square kilometre | 1.26 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low & middle income
- 10 Barbados 17.22 units per square kilometre compare
- 11 Maldives 17.04 units per square kilometre compare
- 12 Aruba 17 units per square kilometre compare
- 13 Bangladesh 16.42 units per square kilometre compare
- 14 Korea 16.28 units per square kilometre compare
- 15 San Marino 16.27 units per square kilometre compare
- 16 Netherlands 15.16 units per square kilometre compare
More health data for Low & middle income
- Population ages 30-34, male, per capita 0.0379 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 40-44, female, annual growth rate 2.32 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per capita 0.0373 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, male, annual growth rate 1.93 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, female, per capita 0.036 units per person (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, female, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population ages 35-39, female, annual growth rate 1.74 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population ages 25-29, male, per capita 0.0388 units per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Low & middle income?
- Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre in Low & middle income was 1.26 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre recorded in Low & middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 1.26 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre recorded in Low & middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2326 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Low & middle income rank for population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre?
- Low & middle income ranks 13th out of 43 groups with data for 2023.
- Is population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre rising or falling in Low & middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 56.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Low & middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population ages 65-69, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population ages 65-69, male ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population ages 65-69, male World Bank staff estimates using the World Bank's total population and age/sex distributions of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population ages 65-69, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.